Why 75 Pages Got a 0.06% CTR While 18 Pages Got 0.72% — Same Site, Same Google

I run a content site with 1,972 published articles across 12 categories. Last month I pulled the data by category and found something that broke my mental model of how SEO works.

One category with 75 pages generated 1,591 Google impressions and got 1 single click — a 0.06% CTR. Another category with just 18 pages generated 139 impressions and also got 1 click — but that's a 0.72% CTR.

Same site. Same Google. Same 28-day period. The smaller category was 12x more efficient at converting impressions into clicks.

Here's what the full category breakdown looks like:

The numbers are raw from Google Search Console. No sampling, no estimates.

The business category is a traffic black hole

Jewelry/Business caught my eye immediately. 75 pages is a serious content investment — that's more pages than Wire Wrapping, Mala, and DIY/Tutorial combined. And those 75 pages did generate real impressions: 1,591 of them, which is 7.5% of all site impressions.

But only 1 click. One. Out of 1,591 impressions.

I went digging into the individual page data. Here's what I found:

• Gold vermeil vs plated vs solid gold — 165 impressions, 0 clicks, avg position 87.1
• Gold plated vs gold filled vs solid gold — 90 impressions, 0 clicks, avg position 92.5
• Gold vermeil vs gold plated vs solid gold — 87 impressions, 0 clicks, avg position 91.6
• Platinum vs white gold vs palladium wedding band comparison — 94 impressions, 0 clicks, avg position 76.3
• Gold vs silver jewelry pros and cons — 109 impressions, 0 clicks, avg position 76.6

Notice a pattern? Every single top page in this category ranks at position 75-92. That's page 8-10 of Google results. Nobody clicks there. The average position for the entire category is 35.4, but that's misleading — it's pulled up by a few outlier queries.

The content itself isn't bad. Average article length across the site is ~15,500 characters. The business articles are actually among the longest at ~16,933 characters average. We're not talking about thin content.

The problem is query intent mismatch. When someone searches "gold vermeil vs plated," they want a quick comparison, probably from a jewelry retailer. A long-form educational article from a crystal blog is the wrong format. Google knows this — that's why it buries us at position 87.

The DIY category punches way above its weight

Now look at DIY/Tutorial: 18 pages, 139 impressions, 1 click, 0.72% CTR. The highest CTR of any category with meaningful data.

The average position is 20.0 — still not great, but 4x better than the business category. And the CTR is 12x higher.

Why? Because DIY/tutorial queries match our content format perfectly. Someone searching "how to wire wrap a crystal" or "resin jewelry tutorial" wants a detailed, step-by-step article. That's exactly what we publish.

The lesson here isn't about keyword research or backlinks. It's about whether your content format matches what the searcher actually wants.

The crystal paradox: volume doesn't equal efficiency

The Crystal category dominates everything — 1,516 pages (77% of all content), 19,084 impressions (89.8%), 96 clicks (96% of all clicks). But its CTR is 0.50%, which sits right in the middle of the pack.

With 1,516 pages generating only 96 clicks, that means 93.7% of crystal pages got zero clicks in 28 days. The category works because of sheer volume, not efficiency. It's the brute force approach — throw 1,500 pages at Google and some will stick.

But here's the thing I keep coming back to: we added 62 pages in the last month (from 1,210 to 1,271 indexed pages), impressions grew 18.3%, but clicks stayed flat at 66. We're getting more eyeballs but not more clicks.

What I'm doing about it

I stopped publishing business-category content. Those 75 pages are staying live — they do generate impressions and some brand visibility — but I'm not adding to them. The ROI is terrible.

Instead, I'm doubling down on DIY and tutorial content where the query intent actually matches what we write. I'm also going through the crystal category and identifying pages that rank between position 11-30 — these are the "almost there" pages where a content refresh might push them onto page 1.

The uncomfortable truth is that more content isn't always better content. My 75-page business category proved that volume without intent alignment is just noise.

What does your category-level data look like?

Most people look at SEO data page by page or site-wide. I'd bet very few have looked at their CTR by content category. If you have GSC access, try grouping your pages by topic or category and comparing CTR across them. You might find your own traffic black hole — a category that's eating your content budget while delivering nothing.

I'm curious: has anyone else found dramatic CTR differences between categories on the same site? What was the biggest gap you've seen?